Examining the frequency and implementation of validation techniques: A content analysis of EdD dissertations in educational leadership

Examining the frequency and implementation of validation techniques: A content analysis of EdD dissertations in educational leadership

Blog Article

This paper describes a content analysis used to examine educational Groomsmen Accessory doctoral degrees (EdD) dissertations in a U.S.university.

The purpose of the study was to get a better understanding of the validation techniques utilized in dissertations published by EdD students.Forty-nine dissertations were selected and examined for research methodologies, research design, and elements of vigorous validation techniques.The most frequently found methodology was quantitative (n = 30; 61.

22%) followed by qualitative (n = 13; 26.53%).Among the quantitative studies, the most frequently used design was survey (n = 18; 60%).

The most frequently used design in qualitative studies was case study (n = 6; 12.14%).Validation techniques for quantitative designs were mostly content validity (n = 18; 50.

00%).Trustworthiness techniques for Dressings qualitative designs were mostly member checking (n = 8; 19.51%).

There were no legitimation techniques identified for mixed methods designs.Implications for this study in higher education include EdD doctoral students and committees use at least three techniques for validation purposes.